This is a well known traditional rider, and One must remember that this horse was first trained in a bit, and in piaffe it is rather over the forelegs (low).
Well, my opinion is predicated upon how to correcty use the cross under the rein design.
I am glad she did the presentation and it has great merit. With this caliber of rider demonstrating bitless, there is no reason to not allow bitless dressage in all levels.
The problem is that once again the correct frame for 'on the bit' is missing. And this correct frame that is stipulated by FEI Articles 401 through 417 is a prerequiste for all the movements, and is predicated upon the health and welfare of the horse.
I have noticed this BTV head carriage in many videos of people doing dressage in cross-under bitless bridles (both Dr. Cook's and Nurtural.) In the videos I've seen the horses which are not ridden in collection stick their noses forward like a Forward Seat horse in a gentle snaffle (I LIKE this), but when collection entered the picture all the horses were BTV even without a bit in their mouths. I did not see that beautiful medium, poll high, flexed, and upright neck. This was the major reason I never even tried to get any collection with my Nurtural, I do not like riding horses BTV. Luckily I am a FS rider and I like the normal headcarriage with the Nurtural et. al..
I would be VERY surprised to see a true flexion of the poll with the bitless bridles I've seen videos of. The rider would need super light hands that are completely independent of the seat and I do not think there would be rein "contact" and the reins would be sagging.
The Spirit bridle is better, but even it REQUIRES light hands and prompt release to get the proper dressage head carriage. Light hands~~ as in strongest contact below 1/2 pound, fingers moving in rhythm with the horse lightly with grams of force, constantly releasing. The horse is in self-carriage. I've gotten it but I have to let it go because my MS starts affecting my hands after a stride or two. In the winter I will be able to do more, at least I hope so!
The LG bitless bridle is the only other bitless bridle I've seen a video where the horse was flexed properly. However the slightly sagging reins were in evidence, the LG works by release, not by pull, at least for longitudinal flexions. I tried contact (a la FS) in the LG and I sort of got cursed out by the horse, though she was fine with sagging reins if my aids were real soft.
I was favorably impressed with this video. Considering the limitations of the head gear the horse was moving freely, springing up in the air instead of pushing up into the air, the gaits were regular, the back was relaxed, and the horse even looked like he was enjoying the movement himself. As I said, I do not expect proper poll flexion in this type of cross-under. Exceptionally good ride!
Wait till I get a video of this Canadian horse under SB for the first time.........then you shall see correct 'on the bit' frame......his rider even shows him in piaffe.
-- Edited by spirithorse on Tuesday 21st of June 2011 06:42:07 PM
It is NOT enough to see an 'on the bit frame' unless we also see the 'on the bit BALANCE'. When a device acts on the head/lever and drops it, we see the piaffe a la goat on the mountain top (forelegs are backward leaning/hindfeet too far under), and this is problematic. One is actually better off with a hackamore and lighter contact.
The horse SHOULD have their noses out, the horse in front of the vertical, seeking outward because of the folding of the hindleg. This is where in FEI a rider needs the nuance of a snaffle (get the horse to chew/stay out to the hand/chewing/ifv/lifting) and a curb (lowering or closing). These are nuanced.
With a completely trained horse, then one can reproduce most of the above work even in a halter, but it does not make the rider capable of nuance. In ANY bb/side pull/hackamore the rider must act and then leave the horse to be rewarded by its change of balance. It is NOT like riding in a bitted bridle at all. The seat/act is equally important. The INTENTION of hh/demi arrets even more.
The thing is a bb of any sort likely only produces a head carriage, even with the seat of a good rider. But they do not mobilize the jaw or allow the nuance of changes of balance having easy effect, and neck is often too lowered (even at times with this well seated lady).
I read your words with great interest Barnfrog. You saw the deficiencies of the performance very well. Due to the heat messing me up I won't be able to make any valid observations of collection with a BB, not that I would get any great observations on an almost 30 year old mare! Maybe with the teenage mare I ride. They won't be observations of me doing the piaffe either, I'll never be at that level.
One thing I noticed with the strapped (Dr. Cook & Nurt.) cross-unders is that my hands hated trying to keep contact with them. I got my best results with slightly sagging reins and well timed hand aids. The only time I got collection with my Nurtural BB was on completely loose reins, I think I was holding them at the buckle. (Neck coming up like a water fountain, flexed at the poll, withers came up, her barrel widened between my legs, and the back of my saddle disappeared downwards under my seat bones.) In fact I think that is the only time I've gotten real collection in my life. No hands, completely loose reins, just legs. This was on the teen-age mare. So it can be done. Not with strong contact though.
I am noticing mouth flexions using the Spirit bridle when I use well timed hand aids, but I do not get them if my timing is off. I have not been asking for poll flexion, but I did get it in an abrupt halt from a trot, using the reins no leg, not full collection, just the poll flexion on the 30 yrl old mare. I am not going to experiment with this for several months, it is the 90's F already and the heat is making my disabilities A LOT worse this year.
What people forget about BB's is that you cannot drive the horse onto a bit with them. The nasal bone is not a substitute for the sensitivity of the horse's tongue and lower jaw. However on a LIGHT rein the cross-unders work mainly on the lower jaw with very light poll pressure. With the rounded leather cross under of the SB I am getting some reactions equal to a bit, and considering how bad my hands are right now the results of the SB are superior to what I would get with a bit. If I did not have MS and had steady hands, legs, and good balance I would be reluctant to give up a bit, but as it is I am delighted to have this option.
People need to ride the BBs with LIGHT reins or problems appear just like with a bit.
The thing is a bb of any sort likely only produces a head carriage, even with the seat of a good rider. But they do not mobilize the jaw or allow the nuance of changes of balance having easy effect, and neck is often too lowered (even at times with this well seated lady).
Barnfrog;
As the quintessential expert in the correct use of the cross under the jaw rein bitless bridle, I can unequivically state that the SB does not just produce head carriage, it creates a free muscle structure in self carriage throughout the entire horse. The nuances required when correctly using the SB are far more subtle than with the bit. The softness of the jaw is greater in SB than in a bit as there is no pressures to the jaw. As for the neck being lower with all of the presentations of bitless dressage, that is because the riders are using the rein aids as if there is a bit.
One of the most important aspects of SB is that the rider's rein aids are affecting the hindquarter through the contact of the poll and thus the hindquarter is correctly engaged. This in conjunction with the supple free forehand creates a completely supple horse who is allowed to seek the extreme light contact of SB and thus allowed to perform its tasks with fluidity.
A rider can drive the horse into containment in ANY halter/bb/etc. Even with a neck strap/wire this is possible. Hence we see losses of balance (onto the forehand) in the (nevertheless) nice work of the fei horse.The nasal bone IS a substitute as well (hence hackamores). The question is: why one would want pressure on the lower jaw OR the poll?? What is to be accomplished by this that contributes to collection?
Alan, HOW does a bb horse 'free the muscles'? Or affect the structure of the horse? Certainly without a bit the horse is freer from the effect of an imbalanced rider, but how does it contribute to training? So far, I have not seen it in training of the horse per se (not the presentations of already trained horses). I have ridden upper levels and jumped horses bitless/bridleless/etc, I think I have a grasp of many different types of training (western/english/etc) and purposes of equipment. Perhaps that is why I am skeptical....I need a clear 'show me'.
How is there to be softness of the jaw with a bb ....defined as chewing and swallowing? Or 'mouth flexions' (I dont understand that term) with the cross under (or any bb/halter/etc) format?
Equally, I do not understand the excuse of a lowered neck in bb. Poll (do you mean at the atlas??) flexion is not what engages the hindquarters. Folding hindquarter joints creates equal flexion in the vertebral bodies of the neck. Engagement is largely a result of correct balance.
How does the cross under allow greater control of the (outside) shoulder on something like a circle (or keep the horse more upright)? This concept is key to greater straightness. But action on right rein puts pressure on the outside jaw and inside nasal bones even with breath of repeated contact. And how to ride an even volte? Those things so far are unclear in all work I have seen.
-- Edited by barnfrog on Tuesday 21st of June 2011 11:17:25 PM
Please recognize that I address your questions from the use of SB for 22 years, and from its design and not the copycat bridles.
I also wish to reiterate that in SB the rider MUST use extremely light rein aids with touch and release phases so that there is no constant pressure to the head structure of the horse. Reconizing that there are times when the rider must take a hold of the bridle.
SB does not apply a locking pressure to the lower jaw. Instead there is a pulling pressure that begins in the rider's fingers and continues to the poll. In fact, when the rider has hold of the reins a horse can open its jaws. When pressure is applied to the rein aid the affect at the poll is a suppling of the muscle structure which allows the lateral flexion of the poll to come into play. This suppleness also creates the lateral flexion of C3 and C3.
The suppleness of the poll region allows the neck, wither and shoulder muscles also to be supple. The neck is not connected to the back in a manner which affects the hindquarters. The neck affects the forehand through the muscles over the withers and the shoulders. Collection, which is merely impedence of forward motion resulting in the compaction of the horse's frame, must be balanced front to rear. In SB, the suppleness of the forehand 'allows' the horse to use its torso muscles to raise the back and thus thoroughly engage the hindquarter. Resulting in strides that are equal.
SB frees the muscles because there are no constraints induced by the horse affecting the muscle structure. This occurs because the rider is not affecting any constraints of the forehand through the rein aids. I also wish to reiterate that in SB the rider MUST use extremely light rein aids.
The freedom of constraints to the muscle structure allow the horse to correctly use its self when being schooled. So the movements desired by the rider can be achieved with more accuracy and in a more timely manner.
Yours and others skepticism is valid. As I have stated so many times, presentations of bitless dressage show riders using the equipment as if it is bitted.
Softness of the jaw as defined by chewing and swallowing is a false representation. Horses that are correctly schooled in SB have absolute freedom of the jaws and yet chewing and swallowing is not a common appearance. That says that the bits are the direct and proximate cause of chewing and swallowing. These actions have a negative affect upon the attention of the horse to the rider...as has been demonstrated using a bit hanger with a simple snaffle in conjunction with SB.
In SB one does not want a lowered neck. When the neck lowers the wither muscles are disengaged which impedes the shoulder muscles. The hindquarters do not have any affect on the lateral flexion of the neck...the lateral flexion of the neck affects the hindquarter.
Ah, the inside/outside rein issue. The inside rein is the directional rein...going left it affects the right poll which creates the movement in the horse's head turning the nose in the direction of travel. The outside rein is the control rein, it follows the inside rein and as a result the horse's body forms an arc of the circle asked for. On the straight line, the rein aids allow the horse to maintain straightness easier because neither shoulder is blocked, this is also true in the circle. In SB, one can turn a horse of any size around a barrel in circle and stay as tight to the barrel as one desires.
Remember in SB the correct usage does not apply constant pressure to any portion of the head. This results in the rider being able to use the rein aid in a touch and release manner...the horse will only change the direction or movement when a new rein aid is asked.
Do these answers help? And by the way, one can ride a bit in this manner, however, the horse will and does apply some constraint to its muscles with a bit in place.
barnfrog wrote:
A rider can drive the horse into containment in ANY halter/bb/etc. Even with a neck strap/wire this is possible. Hence we see losses of balance (onto the forehand) in the (nevertheless) nice work of the fei horse.The nasal bone IS a substitute as well (hence hackamores). The question is: why one would want pressure on the lower jaw OR the poll?? What is to be accomplished by this that contributes to collection?
Alan, HOW does a bb horse 'free the muscles'? Or affect the structure of the horse? Certainly without a bit the horse is freer from the effect of an imbalanced rider, but how does it contribute to training? So far, I have not seen it in training of the horse per se (not the presentations of already trained horses). I have ridden upper levels and jumped horses bitless/bridleless/etc, I think I have a grasp of many different types of training (western/english/etc) and purposes of equipment. Perhaps that is why I am skeptical....I need a clear 'show me'.
How is there to be softness of the jaw with a bb ....defined as chewing and swallowing? Or 'mouth flexions' (I dont understand that term) with the cross under (or any bb/halter/etc) format?
Equally, I do not understand the excuse of a lowered neck in bb. Poll (do you mean at the atlas??) flexion is not what engages the hindquarters. Folding hindquarter joints creates equal flexion in the vertebral bodies of the neck. Engagement is largely a result of correct balance.
How does the cross under allow greater control of the (outside) shoulder on something like a circle (or keep the horse more upright)? This concept is key to greater straightness. But action on right rein puts pressure on the outside jaw and inside nasal bones even with breath of repeated contact. And how to ride an even volte? Those things so far are unclear in all work I have seen.
-- Edited by barnfrog on Tuesday 21st of June 2011 11:17:25 PM
Barnfrog, I've never used a bosal because it does not fit within my system of riding. But I did read everything I could find about them many, many decades ago and the horsemen wrote that the key to the bosal working was not pressure on the nose but the pressure of the lower side branches of the bosal touching and releasing on the lower mandible. I read many writers saying if the rider did not release the pressure that the horse would "go through" the bosal, whereupon it became useless for higher equitation. I am talking about the old vaquero rawhide bosal, fitted to each horse so that it would move against the lower mandible when the reins were use and immediately releasing when the rein pressure lessened. This was for training to use the spade bit after years in the bosal. The old vaqueros were able to get collection suitable for their purposes using the bosal. Since I could see no way I could use it for Forward Seat riding I never experimented with it.
The cross-under straps also work against the lower mandible. The flat strap cross-unders do not release as good as the bosal or the SB.
About the mouth flexions. When I ride in a bit and give a rein aid at the proper time according to the horse's stride, when I release the aid (while keeping contact) I often get a feeling of the horse picking up the bit with its tongue and releasing this. When the horse does this my riding teacher usually exclaims on how the horse's top line relaxes. I get the same result with the SB when I release a correctly timed hand aid, with the horse moving its mouth the same way (as far as I can tell without a bit) and relaxing their top-line (poll, neck muscles on the top of the neck, down to behind the saddle). After this mouth flexion the horse moves in a more supple manner. The horse does NOT move with greater suppleness if this mouth movement does not occur, especially right behind the saddle. Sorry if this is not perfectly clear, it is hard for me to describe it, but it seems to match what the old dressage and FS horsemen write about signs for a proper flexion of the jaw.
I agree with you totally about the difficulties of using the same rein aids with a cross-under as with a bit. I have been experimenting, and while my turns on the hindquarters at a walk are still not as exact as when I use a bit they are improving as my hands adapt to the differences. The timing of the hand aids is a little different. But with my other main lateral move, the turn on the forehand at a walk, I have much better results with the SB than with a bit. I find all this a challenge, but less of a challenge that changing from the effects of a snaffle to the effects of a curb bit. I get my best results if I do my rein aids more like that with a Weymouth curb than with a snaffle (except with the SB I can use a single direct rein of opposition to turn unlike with a Weymouth where I have to use the indirect rein in front of the withers or neck rein.)
My riding teacher is waiting for my to get my reins fixed on my SB so she can borrow it and try it on training her present problem child. This horse had been ridden by one of her dressage students (who takes dressage lessons with another teacher when she can) , in a three piece snaffle, and gotten all confused and irritated. Debbie is re-training him, trying to get him to accept the aids. We shall see what results she gets with the SB versus the 3 piece snaffle or Nurtural BB, but, as always with horse training it can take a few months of work to get everything down pat. There is no instant cure riding at the higher levels no matter what head gear is used.
If the rider uses strong hand aids in the BB the neck will go down and the horse will go behing the vertical and onto its forehand. If the rider does not release the hand aid the same thing will happen. A rider cannot ride in a cross-under like they ride in a bit and expect the same results, though most dressage horses I've seen videos of ridden in a bit were every bit as much on the forehand, BTV, and stiffer in the back as I've seen in the videos of dressage horses ridden in the Dr. Cook or Nurtural BB's.
By the way, MY bitted work depends on how bad my MS is affecting me. If my body is working I get good results with the bit, if my body is not working well the mares make sure to tell me! While I tend to get good results with the bit in the winter I am getting quicker responses with less tension with the SB in the heat than I do with the bits on my best riding days in the winter. AND I am getting poll flexions, something that was not very regular for me even if I am riding in the winter with a bit. Would the mares respond as well without the previous bitted work? Possibly, but they still are responding better than the bit. I have not gotten such good results with the other cross-unders with poll flexion, in fact I have not gotten such good results with poll flexion with a bit. I get flexions of the lower jaw all the time with a bit, but the poll flexion~~no. But then I do not ride dressage and I avoid collection. Any poll flexion or collection I get from the mares is purely voluntary on their part. Also the SB is the only system besides a bit with which I can feel the horse shift its weight from its forehand to its hindquarters with just gentle, well timed rein aids in concert with my legs. I use my legs a lot to keep impulse and to do turning and lateral movements, I do not just ride with my hands.
I have used the SB/other bb/hackamores/bitless/etc are used with touch/release kind of concept. That is the good news and the bad news in all cases, because it easily traps the horse behind the aids, no recycling per se.
And a bitted bridle should be essentially a very light contact which is steady because there must be a 'recycling' of energy for high(er) collection.
No matter NOW you cut it, the cross under bridles DO apply pressure to the lower jaw/poll....we all agree on that point. Why would the rider want (initial) lateral flexion at C3??? I should be initially/lightly at poll/C1. Lateral flexion at C2 is primarily done stand still, but is easily over done. Never the less, how would poll/outer jaw pressure create proper lateral flexion.
Suppleness at C1 (longitudinally)/C2(laterally) per se is not what allows shoulders to be free. But that kind of suppleness starts with mobility of the jaw/chewing and swallowing as well as proper balance. The level of neck is the EXPRESSION of what the hindlegs are doing, and its ability to telescope (within a movement) DOES affect the hindquarters.
Collection is NOT 'merely impedence of forward motion resulting in the compaction of the horse's frame, must be balanced front to rear'. Collection is AMPLITUDE of stride, thrust upward rather than forward and it is the RESULT of COMPRESSION/FLEXION of ALL the hindleg joints. The hindquarters therefore lower as the joints compress and the WITHERS are raise.
The rider in a bb of any type is STILL contraining the forehand, even with the quickest of hh/demi arrets.
The question remains, HOW is this nuance to occur??? With a full bridle the snaffle can immediately give a hh and become more upright, or mobilize the jaw to ask the horse to chew fdo. And the curb can lower/close the throatlatch. Those actions are VERY specific (and obviously combined with the seat/leg/hh/etc). HOW is that to happen in anything without a bit??? Even with a neck strap only there are only hh ability to not any other action.
HOW is the bb to 'provoke' chewing/swallowing? It may happen upon occasion, but it is not a use of the bridle.
Softness of the jaw as defined by chewing and swallowing is definitely NOT a false representation, it is a key to ability to balance and influencing the horse. It also is key to the 'chain of reactions' within the horse's body.
As to the SB not wanting a horse to have a lowered neck....oh my. A horse going FDO does NOT impede the shoulders. Only a lowered flat neck or a horse with the a chest dropped or a hollow back impedes the shoulders. A high neck in and of itself is meaningless.
In movement hindquarter activity on a curved line DOES affect the lateral flexibility of the horse, merely putting the neck into flexion per se can just as easily cause the quarters to fall away.
"The inside rein is the directional rein...going left it affects the right poll which creates the movement in the horse's head turning the nose in the direction of travel. The outside rein is the control rein, it follows the inside rein and as a result the horse's body forms an arc of the circle asked for. .... " I don't get this how there is a positive action on the right side of the poll going to the left puts the nose to the right except by action on the nose. IF the horse is to stand on the outside rein (which is really connected to the inside ring) then why should it be given forward? In order for a horse to have greater straightness it MUST remain positioned inside, esp in higher levels. So, this becomes very muddy to me.
Self carriage (in a bitted bridle) implies that the 'constraints' are in the horse carrying itself, but this is not early on in training.
Interestingly if one studies older traditional materiale, there was use of a caveson (with reins) combined with a curb. Lateral flexibility with the caveson, longitudinal flexion from the curb. VERY methodical use of figures and exercises.
Remember with a bosal one also use mecate reins, and orchestra if reactions. But it was used as a prep for spade bit work. Up/open/active, then progressive training. (And I have worked cattle in many set ups a la the vaquero progressions). For sure it could be used with forward seat/jumping.
There is a reason that the toF should be with a rein in front of the withers rather than a direct rein of opposition (which is a crude aid). The horse shortens and lifts its neck in a proper TOF.
For sure, if the rider uses strong hand aids in the BB the neck will go down and the horse will go behing the vertical and onto its forehand. If the rider does not release the hand aid the same thing will happen. .....this applies in bb/bitted bridles/etc.
Jackie, when you are talking about 'poll flexions" what do you mean? Lateral or longitudinal? When I speak flexions for the most part I am talking about mm of flexion at C2 (flipping the nuchal ligament) and then immediately seeking fdo. Work in hand first is high(er)/light, then lateral flexilbility, then chewing fdo, longitudinal flexion comes over time.
Agreed that bend should originate in the (positioning of the) legs, but this is not part of the message.
Let me begin with your statement: The rider in a bb of any type is STILL contraining the forehand, even with the quickest of hh/demi arrets.
This clearly demonstrates that you do not have a clue as to the effect that SPIRIT BRIDLE has upon the horse and that you have never used it or if you did use SB you used it incorrectly
Second statement by you: because it easily traps the horse behind the aids, no recycling per se
Once again this demonstrates your lack of knowledge on the correct use of the SPIRITBRIDLE because SB does not in any manner trap a horse behind the aids.
Third statement by you: Why would the rider want (initial) lateral flexion at C3???Suppleness at C1 (longitudinally)/C2(laterally) per se is not what allows shoulders to be free. as well as proper balance. The level of neck is the EXPRESSION of what the hindlegs are doing
Lateral flexion in the neck should never occur in just one joint. In order for true flexion of the neck to occur C3 is enjoined in the process. Apparently you have never examined the muscle structure of the horse. The neck is not affected by the hindquarters...........suppleness of the neck can only come from neck flexion.
Fourth statement by you: The hindquarters therefore lower as the joints compress and the WITHERS are raise
The withers raise without the hindquarter lowering, as the withers are only muscularly affected by the neck
Fifth statement by you: Softness of the jaw as defined by chewing and swallowing is definitely NOT a false representation, it is a key to ability to balance and influencing the horse.
You are influenced by traditional concepts. The licking and chewing is false because unbitted horse usually do not involve themselves with such actions.
Sixth statement by you: As to the SB not wanting a horse to have a lowered neck....oh my. A horse going FDO does NOT impede the shoulders.
A horse going FDO does compress the freedom of the shoulders!!!!! Examine the muscle structure of the horse and also watch the stride length of the forehand in FDO....IT IS SHORTENED
I wish you really had a working knowledge of SB before you make statements that are a misrepresentation of it. Reminds me of Hilda Gurney and her statement to the USDF that there she found no difference between bitless and bitted.
barnfrog wrote:
I have used the SB/other bb/hackamores/bitless/etc are used with touch/release kind of concept. That is the good news and the bad news in all cases, because it easily traps the horse behind the aids, no recycling per se.
And a bitted bridle should be essentially a very light contact which is steady because there must be a 'recycling' of energy for high(er) collection.
No matter NOW you cut it, the cross under bridles DO apply pressure to the lower jaw/poll....we all agree on that point. Why would the rider want (initial) lateral flexion at C3??? I should be initially/lightly at poll/C1. Lateral flexion at C2 is primarily done stand still, but is easily over done. Never the less, how would poll/outer jaw pressure create proper lateral flexion.
Suppleness at C1 (longitudinally)/C2(laterally) per se is not what allows shoulders to be free. as well as proper balance. The level of neck is the EXPRESSION of what the hindlegs are doing, and its ability to telescope (within a movement) DOES affect the hindquarters.
Collection is NOT 'merely impedence of forward motion resulting in the compaction of the horse's frame, must be balanced front to rear'. Collection is AMPLITUDE of stride, thrust upward rather than forward and it is the RESULT of COMPRESSION/FLEXION of ALL the hindleg joints. The hindquarters therefore lower as the joints compress and the WITHERS are raise.
The rider in a bb of any type is STILL contraining the forehand, even with the quickest of hh/demi arrets.
The question remains, HOW is this nuance to occur??? With a full bridle the snaffle can immediately give a hh and become more upright, or mobilize the jaw to ask the horse to chew fdo. And the curb can lower/close the throatlatch. Those actions are VERY specific (and obviously combined with the seat/leg/hh/etc). HOW is that to happen in anything without a bit??? Even with a neck strap only there are only hh ability to not any other action.
HOW is the bb to 'provoke' chewing/swallowing? It may happen upon occasion, but it is not a use of the bridle.
Softness of the jaw as defined by chewing and swallowing is definitely NOT a false representation, it is a key to ability to balance and influencing the horse. It also is key to the 'chain of reactions' within the horse's body.
As to the SB not wanting a horse to have a lowered neck....oh my. A horse going FDO does NOT impede the shoulders. Only a lowered flat neck or a horse with the a chest dropped or a hollow back impedes the shoulders. A high neck in and of itself is meaningless.
In movement hindquarter activity on a curved line DOES affect the lateral flexibility of the horse, merely putting the neck into flexion per se can just as easily cause the quarters to fall away.
"The inside rein is the directional rein...going left it affects the right poll which creates the movement in the horse's head turning the nose in the direction of travel. The outside rein is the control rein, it follows the inside rein and as a result the horse's body forms an arc of the circle asked for. .... " I don't get this how there is a positive action on the right side of the poll going to the left puts the nose to the right except by action on the nose. IF the horse is to stand on the outside rein (which is really connected to the inside ring) then why should it be given forward? In order for a horse to have greater straightness it MUST remain positioned inside, esp in higher levels. So, this becomes very muddy to me.
Self carriage (in a bitted bridle) implies that the 'constraints' are in the horse carrying itself, but this is not early on in training.
Interestingly if one studies older traditional materiale, there was use of a caveson (with reins) combined with a curb. Lateral flexibility with the caveson, longitudinal flexion from the curb. VERY methodical use of figures and exercises.
Remember with a bosal one also use mecate reins, and orchestra if reactions. But it was used as a prep for spade bit work. Up/open/active, then progressive training. (And I have worked cattle in many set ups a la the vaquero progressions). For sure it could be used with forward seat/jumping.
There is a reason that the toF should be with a rein in front of the withers rather than a direct rein of opposition (which is a crude aid). The horse shortens and lifts its neck in a proper TOF.
For sure, if the rider uses strong hand aids in the BB the neck will go down and the horse will go behing the vertical and onto its forehand. If the rider does not release the hand aid the same thing will happen. .....this applies in bb/bitted bridles/etc.
Jackie, when you are talking about 'poll flexions" what do you mean? Lateral or longitudinal? When I speak flexions for the most part I am talking about mm of flexion at C2 (flipping the nuchal ligament) and then immediately seeking fdo. Work in hand first is high(er)/light, then lateral flexilbility, then chewing fdo, longitudinal flexion comes over time.
Agreed that bend should originate in the (positioning of the) legs, but this is not part of the message.
I am talking about poll flexion longitudinaly. I am not currently at a physical level that I can even think of asking for the side flexion of the poll, that will have to wait for the fall, late fall when it does not get above 70 F!
A REALLY good FS rider may be able to use a bosal and ride FS, but since I do not have good balance I do not think it is fair to the horse for me to try it, I respect the authority of the bosal! For FS I find that the old style of jumping cavesson bridle, with the divided cheek pieces is the best bitless if one wants to keep consistent contact with "passive" hands. I've been using mine for almost 40 years. However the Jumping cavesson bridle does not have the authority of a cross-under, and it really helps to have a cooperative horse!
Because of my hand tremors I allow the horses to gently lengthen the reins through my fingers whenever they want to extend their necks (my fingers are usually soft and relaxed.) This is the main way I currently convince my horses to accept contact with anything, bit or bitless. Mia, for one, does not allow me to restrain her head no matter what I use, unless there is an emergency, then she accepts it. The flexions of the lower jaw happen AFTER I release my hand aid, not during it with both the bit or the SB. Who knows, maybe this is her signal that she approves of the action of my hands and she is rewarding me!
Mia is an old Arab mare, arthritic and very finicky with her mouth and nose. She does not allow me to restrain her forehand without protest. Whichever head action she gives me is usually of her own free will on light rein. I know this because, invariably, when she thinks my hands are too hard she curls up behind the bit/nose band or shoots her head up in inversion and does not react correctly to the aids. I was totally amazed when she flexed her poll, I never thought I would get it from her. Again, I will have to wait for the cooler weather before I can even think of asking her to flex her poll in whatever direction.
Jackie, the thing is that lateral flexibility is the KEY to shades of longitudinal flexion. It can be started in hand, and it teaches the horse to also be able to follow the outside reins (into a longer posture) as well.
(What is FS???)
I agree about an old side pull, and it is much more close to the work of hundreds of years ago with de la G as well.
Alan, as I said anything on a horse's head (or neck...with bridless) constrains the forehand....no matter how quick the aid of the rider. Perhaps we are defining 'constraint' differently???? All dod it both in lateral flexibility and longitudinal balance (this was clear in your vids of your students in SB with lowered necks?)
A bb/bosel DOES 'trap' the horse between the effect on the head/neck and the seat/leg. In one balance. You can say, well so does a bitted one. And that is in part true, but with the effect on the lips/etc one can also provoke changes in length of the neck/chewing fdo/etc. More tools in the training bag than w/o a bit.
YOU are the one that says that lateral flexion is at C3....so you are staying one joint. I am asking why you said that vertebral body? What is the source? BEND is does evenly through the vertebral bodies that is true, but initial POSITIONING of the neck IS esp at C2 (the 'no' flexion...and at C1 is is 'yes' or lightly longitudinally). And yes, I have watched autopsies and examined vertebral bodies. I also know that by millimeters of lateral flexion at C1-C2 the nuchal ligament 'flicks over'. And that this nuance is one of the touchstones of traditional dressage training. This depth of analysis is part of observing how horses use their bodies optimally if training is to be traditional.
The withers raise as the hindleg joints compress because the base of support is shortened. The horse appears to 'take off like a jet' (like a horse jumping, or one in levade).
It is not just the chewing which is important to traditional training, it is the swallowing. Just as with us. When the horse is ridden 'in position' it chews, the mastrix muscle produces saliva, when the horse chews and swallows it also offers longitudinal flexion. It is all interrelated. Can an appearance of the same thing be invented otherwise? A seeming one, until we look deeper.
IF a horse is sustained too long/low in the 'chewing the reins from the hand' exercise the stride length might shortened. But fdo is small degree is part of extension...the shoulders have MORE freedom (unless the horse is held closed). I use traditional concepts, you take them as the RK groups use. Those are different things.
IF you want us to understand something different about a bb for sure do a more vids to prove your points, so far that has not been the case. Make it so.
IF HG really believed that then she would save the horse's mouths and have her jyr students training bb rather than slapping on full bridles to get through the jyr fei level tests.
Clearly there is a difference. Even the vid we are discussing is the horse first trained bitted, then showing the same work (??) w/o it. Or Henrequit in a halter. They do not train that way, they show off that way. Stuff we all did when we were kids.
YOU are the one that says that lateral flexion is at C3....so you are staying one joint. I am asking why you said that vertebral body? What is the source? BEND is does evenly through the vertebral bodies that is true, but initial POSITIONING of the neck IS esp at C2 (the 'no' flexion...and at C1 is is 'yes' or lightly longitudinally). And yes, I have watched autopsies and examined vertebral bodies. I also know that by millimeters of lateral flexion at C1-C2 the nuchal ligament 'flicks over'. And that this nuance is one of the touchstones of traditional dressage training. This depth of analysis is part of observing how horses use their bodies optimally if training is to be traditional.
Barnfrog:
I NEVER said that lateral flexion is at C3.....I said that C3 is a part of the lateral flexion. In competitive dressage horses the BEND in the neck is not even correctly in place, simply because the muscle structure of the neck is constrained.
Lateral flexion begins at the joint of C1 and the occiptal protrudence and 'should' continue throughout the rest of the remaining six joints of the neck.
The nuchal ligament 'flip' is not the cause of lateral flexion, it is the result of the neck muscles being supple, for without supple neck muscles the ligament could not flip.
Lateral flexion is far more important than longitudinal flexion, for the lateral flexion is what produces the suppleness of the muscle structure.
As for observing autopsies and this giving comprehension of the operations of the muscles....my cavalry vet told me years ago that the only way to understand muscles was to see them function! I have had two injuries in my life that defied the expert doctors who tended to me.....and both times their conclusions were the same, the suppleness of my muscle structure is what produced the incredible healing......
The withers raise as the hindleg joints compress because the base of support is shortened. The horse appears to 'take off like a jet' (like a horse jumping, or one in levade).
Once again you are incorrect, simply because when riders correctly use SPIRIT BRIDLE they feel the withers raise without feeling further engagement of the hindquarters.............besides if you really studied equine anatomy you would see that your statement is actually not possible due to the design of the equine muscle structure. Purchase "Horse Anatomy, A Pictorial Approach to Equine Anatomy" Second Edition by Peter Goody with illustrations by John Goody
When the horse is ridden 'in position' it chews, the mastrix muscle produces saliva, when the horse chews and swallows it also offers longitudinal flexion.
This statement is false as un-bitted ridden horses prove time and time again.
But fdo is small degree is part of extension...the shoulders have MORE freedom (unless the horse is held closed)
FDO is not a part of extension in the least, simply because the muscle structure of the horse will not allow for extension when the head of the horse is lowered below the line of the withers.
I have been riding in SPIRIT BRIDLE for over twenty years and the results that are produced on every horse are the same. Yes, they contradict tradition and that is the problem. You choose not to 'allow' yourself to even fathom the possibility that we just might have been schooling our horses in opposition to their requirements. Something folks seem to easily forget is that I was schooled traditionally, to the extent that I had to ride dressage and work cattle in a simple snaffle without me taking hold of the bit nor the horse taking hold of the bit. If you choose to be unwilling to learn something from the horses, so be it.
I do enjoy your posts and questions though.
-- Edited by spirithorse on Wednesday 22nd of June 2011 11:35:55 PM
I just want to chime in and give a vote for Horse Anatomy: A Pictorial Approach to Equine Structure 2nd Edition by Peter Goody -- this is a great book! We used it along side our other textbooks when I took Equine Functional Anatomy, it was a great help
__________________
Courage is being scared to death but saddling up anyway. - John Wayne
Although I agree that many competition horses are too compressed to have even bending (in the neck) or even proper positioning (ie AvG rides in position right almost always), this does not negate the comments. Why bring up C3 at alll in lateral flexibility discussions, C3 is where the longitudinal break often occurs. So I am still mixed up by your comments.
Fiipping of the nuchal ligament only happens with proper positioning, not by pulling a horse to the inside. It is also easily linked with mobilization of the jaw. A horse can be free in the neck muscles and still not flip the crest over. And in general it is more an action at C1-C2, not at the occipital lobe.
For sure FDO's action (in a small degree as I said)) IS part of extension, the horse lengthens it frame and stays IFV in order to do an extension an use its entire body to gait ground. The horse does NOT lower the neck below the level of the withers in ANY exercise, save when it is learning chewing the reins from the hand an loses balance.
The only thing that conterdicts tradition is your own definitions of exercises/collection which you have not (by your own admission) not done.
I fathom MANY possibilities, but I also require proofs. I am one of a few people (there used to be a lot) which have ridden all the 'seats' and trained horse from beginning to trained in all the disciplines. (And I started out almost before I could walk working cattle). I observe all the different schools (ie french/german/scandanavian/russian/spanish/portuguese) and look for their essences, and have studied with representatives of them as well (in depth). I use the commonalities, and I question why the nuances particular to that school 'work' (both with the upside and down side!)
I can only go by the work you have presented in the bb so far in photos and vids, and so far they do not fulfill expectations. That is not to say they do not serve a purpose for a part of the riding public. But equally your definitions of what is 'by the rules' are so far not by those directives (in the eyes of those who have produced high levels of collection). And perhaps therein is the rub.
Here is a good discussion of the long back muscles/etc (and his book is throughly worth buying http://www.amazon.com/Tug-War-Classical-Incorrect-Negatively/dp/1570763755/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1308841740&sr=8-2 http://www.schleese.com/documents/FUNCTIONAL%20ANATOMY%20OF%20THE%20HORSE.pdf
Some good source materials:
Conformation & Movement
Bennett, DebConformational Analysis I, II& III (by Equus)
And especially good is Nancy Nicholsen's http://nicholnl.wcp.muohio.edu/DingosBreakfastClub/BioMech/BioMechRide1.html and her site actually shows all the muscles working within each gat!!!!!!
A more in depth list if any one wants it (and I have 497 books in my dressage libary this is a key part as well>:
Anatomy, Behavior, Alternative medicine, Care, Conformation, Feeding, Lameness, Physiology, Shoeing, Sport Med, Veterinary
AdamsLameness in Horses
AshdownVeterinary Anatomy
Baxter, MichaelAcademy of Equine Sport Therapy
Bayley, LesleyUnderstanding Your Horse
Bendlage, DougMerck Veterinary Manual, The
Bennett, DebConformational Analysis I, II& III(by Equus)
FS is Forward Seat, the revolutionary jumping seat that Frederico Caprilli developed in the Italian cavalry in the late 1890's to his death in 1907. At some point over the jump people still use the FS, now mostly known as 2-point. But the FS is not just about position, the American FS system is about position, control, and schooling in the FS method. I have done several blogs on the FS here on Barnmice. Anyway, we FS people do not use collection like dressage people do, if the horse of its own free will collects to carry out our orders it is OK but I am always sure to gently send the horse FORWARD and extend its neck out whenever it happens.
Lateral flexion of the poll leading to longitudinal flexion? Well, I have been working on turning on both mares for over two years now, using both hand and leg. Being a FS rider I let the horse decide the best way to carry its own neck and head (except emergencies or sudden halts). Nowadays I usually ask for a turn by lenthening my outside rein alternating with my outside leg at the girth for gradual turns, the horses do not slow down in the turn and they seem to prefer this method. Maybe by lengthening my outside rein for turns I relaxed the poll joints enough so I could to the logintudinal flexion, I don't know. I know that this is not the approved classical method but it works for me and the horses I ride.
Because of my physical handicaps (yes, plural) I cannot do the "traditional" dressage training methods, I have had to find ways that I can do things in spite of my handicaps. I know, I tried for decades when I was younger just to be good within the FS framework, and any time I tried to do the poll flexions all I got was iron jaws. My horses were right, at that time I was undiagnosed, but the MS has been affecting me most of my life and I was never good enough physically to get results the "traditional" way in both advance FS riding and dressage.
I value all of your observations barnfrog, they obviously come from a great deal of experience. Mine do to, though probably not as much experience as yours. I get results, I can get results from lesson horses that the riding teachers have not seen before with that horse. I improve the horses I ride in spite of my handicaps. They become softer to the hand, more cooperative to the aids, and more reliable horses for their true purpose in life, teaching kids how to ride. And occasionally the horses GIVE me rammener, and once or twice ressambler (croup down too). I never tell them to do either because I am very aware of my limitations. When it happens I just try not to destroy the moment. Otherwise I ride FS, emphasis on calm, free forward movement, on light contact when my hands are good enough, and the horse decides what to do with its head and neck during movement and in response to my aids.
This is why I found it so amazing when Mia volunteered rammener in a quick halt in the SB. I would not have gotten it with a bit since my hands were pretty bad that day. If she was not spavined in one hock she might of tried lowering her croup too, but since she is almost 30 I am thrilled at whatever she offers in this direction.
Why does a horse have to be driven into a bridle, bit or otherwise, to get collection or flexion? Don't horses do this quite naturally when they are "in the mood" at liberty? I see my Arab do it quite often, and I see Arabs in shows at liberty who seem quite capable of the right frame without any human interfering. I am pretty unknowledgeable about dressage training but I would say the challenge would be to get a horse to do what they do naturally, unconstrained, but with a rider on their back and on cue. Collection to me seems to have more to do with the attitude of the horse than driving or constraining their energy. Why would that require a bit? I just have this feeling that horses do all this stuff in spite of the aids people use rather than because of them.
Seems you feel the need not to accept my experience. And you choose to throw out a laundry list of articles and books.
The first image is of Dr. Hilary Claytonand the second image is of Dr. Deb Bennett .
Sorry but these so called equine biomechanics experts clearly demonstrate their lack of knowledge as to what the horse requires to move correctly. What I find facinating about the 'experts' is that they simply do not want to be challenged on their findings.
Spirit Bridle and the results from its correct use speak volumes as to the lack of knowledge by the 'experts'. I need not prove anything to you or anyone else, for the impact upon the horses owned and ridden by riders in SB is all I strive for.
-- Edited by spirithorse on Thursday 23rd of June 2011 12:43:41 PM
Marlene, you are right about the Arabs! I have often watched with utter amazement at Arabs playing, often thinking "gee, I'm glad they don't do that under saddle, I'd be off!"
I have come up with a hypothesis that dressage exists to get other breeds of horses to move like Arabs do naturally without the specialized physical training (obvious exceptions of some Iberian horses, they can play like that too, just not as springy usually.)
I do know that it is harder to get an Arabian into a good Forward Seat movement than any other breed I've ridden, I have to convince the Arabs to move their heads down and poke out their noses! Their mouths are so sensitive, their jawbones so far apart, and their mitbahs (throatlatch, poll, 1st two cervical vertebrae) so flexible that it is the dickens to get them to accept "normal" FS contact. Most Forward Seat riders do not like Arabs, I view them as the supreme challenge, in the FS way of riding if an Arab reliably accepts the bit with a relaxed jaw the rider's hands are very light and very, very good. I find with my MS that they tend to prefer bitless on sagging reins though they are kind enough and patient enough to allow me to use a bit with contact, IF I am good and listen to everything they say!
Exactly! True collection is the result of attitude. In comparing correctly ridden bitted horses versus correctly vridden un-bitted horses, one can clearly see the attitude of collection in the un-bitted horses.
Compressed and constrained horses do not produce pure true collection, they produce learned helplessness collection.
Marlene wrote:
Why does a horse have to be driven into a bridle, bit or otherwise, to get collection or flexion? Don't horses do this quite naturally when they are "in the mood" at liberty? I see my Arab do it quite often, and I see Arabs in shows at liberty who seem quite capable of the right frame without any human interfering. I am pretty unknowledgeable about dressage training but I would say the challenge would be to get a horse to do what they do naturally, unconstrained, but with a rider on their back and on cue. Collection to me seems to have more to do with the attitude of the horse than driving or constraining their energy. Why would that require a bit? I just have this feeling that horses do all this stuff in spite of the aids people use rather than because of them.
Thanks jackie, I just didnt get the FS as an abbreviation. And I am heartily believe in the Caprilli seat, the US 'ruled the world' with jumping with they stuck with it (under Jack LeGoff)!!!! As someone who worked with him, I know the work well, and he did also believe in collection, as did Gunner Andersen (who was a teacher long term of George Morris) and who I rode ith as well. But all those peeps taught a stable outside connection to allow the (inside leg) to control the outside shoulder (for QUICK turns). And horses should maintain the same tempo in a turn, not slow down and then speed up. For what it is worth I know of two riders with MS, and one still rides FEI and is very traditional, and I have taught a young lady with spina bifida as well.
Poll flexions (first high/light) then the lightes of lateral flexion is the key to the mouth before ever mounting. It has taken numerous horses from clenched jaws to softly chewing and swallowing with very basic riders. It absolutely is NOT meant to be used with a low/closed posture, that causes the horse to brace against the hand (like a 5th leg). And many try to flex laterally first (often by problematically sawing l/r) before the horse is up/open first.
I appreciate that you can get both rammener, and once or twice ressambler upon occasion. That is a tribute to your recognizing it. as well. It is helpful to now that a brisk transition/halt will lift the horse up and cause the hindquarters to fold. And the rammener you got was because of the release. But then what? How to you signal to the horse that it is allowed to chew fdo? The steps are SO interlaced.
Marlene, a horse should not be 'driven into the bridle' in any case. A bridle should first be just a connection with the rider w/o flexion. Up open active just as in liberty. Even if one uses side reins, they are merely connected, and when ridden the mouth is only steadily held. But when we sit upon it the balance changes because the line changes at our whims. So, how to develop the horse to the full degree of what it does free. For sure allowing the horse to be upright/free/ifv/moving. And flexion comes over time, first laterally from bended lines, and over time longitudinally. In order to collect (amplitude of stride upward vs ground covering flatter extensions) the horse has to learn how to flex and compress its joints in the hindlegs). and this happens over time. The individual bits allow for great finesse. Remember that the odgs did use draw reins on cavesons for lateral flexibility, they spent way more hours than any of us will contemplate observing the horses. The nuance of placing the horse, encouraging a balance in mm simply takes more than bitless can do. We see that in the vid which started this discussion.
Alan, I have judged HC, and that is a problematic piaffe (goat on a mountain top/forward over the front legs). She studies what IS, but I am not sure if she has an idea about what should be. It is GIGO. As far as Deb, she is an expert at the Smithsonian on dinasaur movement and also has studied horses. A rider she is not, an expert on movement imho she is. That said, they are both aligned, but now they have to learn the next steps. If you think that getting to FEI (for those who have not trained to high collection) is easy...it is NOT.
I would take Nancy Nicholson any time, she is a teacher/trainer/system analysis person who has spent about 25 years on horses alone, and has trained multiple horses to FEI. While I agree with the negatives in the pix you post, please show us something to take its place (the grey with a hollowed back over caveletti is incorrect, and the youngsters in the field are nice beginners which are not abusing the horse, and the girl at the fairgrounds well that should be forgotten) but now move on and show us how the bend/collection is properly done in this.
And the OP's video or Henriquet in a halter is not a horse TRAINED in that manner.
I love all horses and like the ease of training tbs/arabs/etc. And I agree with jackie about training arabs (any horse with a high set neck, a thin throatlatch) HAVE to spent a longer period of time riding the horse out to the hand (in a bit or NOT)....they must spend time lower/longer to correctly develop the gaits. This is where the need for properly lateral positioning is KEY to getting the horse to chew and stay out to the hand, yet VERY open, before training can continue. Otherwise they have short neck/C3 highest point, often btv. Kellog ranch knew this (earliest importers on the west coast). And horses were much more the polish type ( a sport horse type ) vs the egpytian type which have been frightfully bred into a characture.
We can all agree that compressed and constrained horses are NOT collected. But equally it does not just take a bit to create such a sin. Holding and driving doesnt work and never has. Equally letting a horse be hollow is not collection either.
Hi again Banfrog, I wish I could ride at an Olympic level but my life did not work out that way. For my puttering around the ring for just 30 to 60 minutes a week it has taken me years to get the old Arab mare strong enough to think about flexing. Since I am rarely strong enough to canter and most of the gaits are on the slow extended side it is pointless for me to demand collection. If I was riding international jumping courses I would probably think differently!
As for chewing the bit as the horse lowers its head with nose in front, I get that too. I do not "demand" it, like everything else the horses give it to me when I do things to their satisfaction. I usually get it right after a halt. As I said before the horses I ride know they can take all the rein they need, and I get that quite frequently when I ride at a walk or trot in the bit, they don't chew then but their mouths are quite soft and relaxed and they keep their gait and speed when I remind them that I did not tell them to slow down! I can tell you it is a thrill to me when the Arabs I've ridden for a while, both refusing any contact at first, finally realized they could safely take rein from my hands. This is not a dive, this is a gentle stretching out of the neck with the reins slowly slipping through my fingers. Maybe someday they will be happier with me and chew on the way down while moving, but, as always, it is up to the horse.
Jack LeGoff and George Morris did/do not ride in the FS system that I use, I am more in the Caprilli, Vladimir Littauer, Jane Dillon, Kirschner school. No collection except when the horse does it on his own when he thinks needs to. With my MS this is the only way I can ride effectively, if I tried to get the horses to do the dressage thingies I would probably ruin my horse's mouths and I would end up with tense, sour, uncooperative horses instead of cheerful relaxed forward striding ones. Just my limitations, not a comment on how you or anyone else rides and trains. I am not going anywhere after all, I just putter around the ring for half an hour. I might as well try to insure that the horses enjoy it too.
(the grey with a hollowed back over caveletti is incorrect
Barnfrog: this statement is evidence of your inability to visually comprehend equine anatomy. The back is not hollow, the shoulders are fully engaged the back is up and the hindquarters are thoroughly engaged. Look at the white line drawn, it rests just under the saddle.........natural back line. Then look at the white line drawn in the other image, an image of a licensed dressage judge..........the back is hollow. And Totilas under Gal definitely had a hollow back as is seen in the irregular stride lengths and 4 beat trot.
If you think that getting to FEI (for those who have not trained to high collection) is easy...it is NOT.
This is not valid since all the dressage movements are done naturally by the horse. It is the trainers/riders that impede the athletic ability of the horse to achieve the ridden movements.
We have debated that pix ad infinitum. If one looks at the writings (and work of a master of caveletti) of Klimke who did use caveletti (both at a normal height and occactionally raised and with fences) and Harry Boldt who hated them, this would be the opinion of HB. Why? The negative side is when a horse goes over caveletti (esp raised ones which are easily problematic to relaxation and soundness) they must seek more long in the frame to keep the back swinging, it must raise the back as well as cause greater use the neck forward/out and slightly down to be of benefit from them (this is not my opinion but that of a rider from 6 olympics). If it is does not it pushes the loins down, flattens the croup and the horse steps shorter as it goes further through (rather than to the middle of each caveletti which is KEY to knowing the right distance for the individual horse), so the further the horse goes into the caveletti the more it has to come up with the neck to just keep going, and the hindlegs are used in such a way that the hooves are showing themselves to the sky (and never should the rider sit on a horse's back over raised caveletti). The higher the caveletti the more the horse should elongate its frame in order to keep the back swinging. If a horse had to jump following this kind of caveletti work it would have to jump hollow because it has not developed an even stride (to the middle of the each one), and it is struggling to step to the middle the further it gets into them. The point is to articulate the joints on the forward swing, not to cause a lift the joints out behind. I have used caveletti for 50 years, I know their effects in different heights and to fences. Raised caveletti are set shorter as the strides are higher, but are more generally used for canter bounces (at 10'-12' average). I have used them set higher to develop gaits in horses with little articulation of the joints, but very carefully done and through a 6 month period or the body would suffer.
As to the side saddle pix, the horses back line is under the (right) calf of the rider, I know. It's my side saddle (not the horse I won FEI ss however, another horse with weaker gaits). It was me playing on a horse for his first time ever under side saddle and he thought it rather weird that he should go into any sort of piaffe in this manner. The owner thought it fun, I thought it weak and also a horrid moment of piaffe. The chest is not dropped, but the horse is too high and not free enough in the forelegs. But the height of the (rider's) leg is (being so high on the body) is a new sensation for such a horse. Btw, its in the dog's lunge area about 10' from their house. Not a promotional piece. And I am more than willing to discuss the pix shortcomings and etc.
In any case, I stand by the words that it is NOT easy to put together an FEI horse and have all the movements 'on demand' vs just doing them. It it is a long journey of developing understanding with the rider PROGRESSIVELY. Of course all the movements are something done naturally, we all know that. It is we riders who have to learn to communicate. The ideas are SIMPLE but learning to 'speak horse" is not. Timing is EVERYTHING. IF it were not dependent upon developing the ease of conversation everyone would do it. Certainly all horses CAN do piaffe in hand (if sound), but under a rider, not so easy. NOT all horses will do one tempis, no matter WHO sits upon them.
I am in agreement with barnfrog. Alan, you have a lot of nerve trying to imply that this woman is ignorant. She's forgotten more than you'll ever know. I rode with her in a clinic years ago, and she showed me what I lacked. I am forever grateful.
You post what you believe is your "best" image, then you post the image of another rider (not a good one, even she admits it) to attempt to prove your point. Classless.
Your posts are thinly disguised adverts for your bridle.
I did not imply she is ignorant, I specifically stated she is unwilling to learn something new from a source that is not credentialed or a big winner in the dressage court.....that is shameful. She has no respect for my 22 years of experience in SB and that shows disrespect for what I have learned from the horses and NOT FROM MAN.
I just came back from a lesson in which the horse was teaching me about her personality and I had to learn to work with her...................knowledge is not stagnant........at least it should not be.
And I am getting sick and tired of your constant diatribe about my posts being adverts for my bridle. I could less about marketing my bridle in posts.........
my posts are about knowledge the horses have taught me and if you do not like that so be it.
Nothing could be further from the truth. I will repeat, I learn something new from the horse or rider or timing nuances almost every day, but it based upon proper balance, ease of reaction being shown to me. It is from equitational nuances defining what is MOST correct. ie People like Manelo Mendez have awakened obervations and abilities in shaping reshaping the horse for (greater) soundness IN MOVEMENT (taking lame horses and creating different movement) by sculpting with touches (of bamboo) which are mindboggling and vets are taking it up as well!!! Anyone who does not learn from the truth of the horse every day is a fool. Although a founder of the Portuguese National school he is not a big winner, he is a humble person who works with horses AND proves his points with almost every step. Show me the results, and I will sign up. Creations of beauty make the hair on the neck sign up, they reveal the master. Peeps like PP can sell their rope halters and special bridles of all types and stick and books, but the truth is not in those items but in the work of the handler and their education.
I do not disrespect the years in bb, I see a use for it, but I have not yet seen it used in such a way to do more than basics. That you will have to prove, you choose the way and the instrument, now show the results if you want believers. Myself, I just try to impart what i was entrusted with to the best of my ability. With my students their work with their horses under traditional principles advance them and the horse, the proof is their learning how to train effectively themselves, that is how tradition is passed on (or with dies because of lack of definition). In order to earn respect in a given field (dressage not riding per se) there are touchstones of balance/collection/etc which MUST be met. Not by one's own definition of xyz, but by time tested principles. People like Nuno were handsomely respected in their day because the outcomes of their work (although the methods were different) fulfilled these principles. Same for Manolo/PK/von N/Andersen/Frau Franke/etc.
In order to discuss the outcomes of training we MUST have the same meanings for the same words. It is easy for outsiders to ignore the words of far greater experts than any of us will ever be. Even Thirty or forty years ago all the disciplines seemed to have the same equitational standards, noted the same ideas of collection, had like definitions. Without perfected equitational alignment and timing of aids, there is little conversation. Those things been muddied down. Now it is a free for all with lack of articulated principles or commonality of purpose. It is what has allowed peeps like AvG and SJ to become prophets. No one says this is not tradition, and it is not right because of these missing elements. Well I am old enough, and perhaps stupid enough, to try to ask for order. To ask questions, and to keep asking questions. Perhaps it is an american sloppiness to not read (guidelines/tradition/investigative works/etc), just go do a few clinics and call it good. Peeps want to wear give clothes or use a piece of equipment rather than perfect technique to supposedly make the horse's life better. Easier to throw away tradition en toto in search of a panacea rather than ride with more insight every day and accept slow progress.
-- Edited by barnfrog on Friday 24th of June 2011 02:20:59 AM
While none of us always agree with each other, these forums (and this specific discussion) ARE about learning. Without open discussion learning is often impeded, if not impossible.
Frankly, having made several horses and riders to Grand Prix, and by that I mean horses and riders who can reasonably and successfully negotiate the demands of the Grand Prix and the Special IN COMPETITION, I have to support Barnfrog in her statement regarding the difficulties involved in so doing. It's a great challenge for trainers, coaches, riders and horses, but therein lies the joy.
I have nothing against "alternatives" like bitless bridles, used as a short-term tool. However, the FEI RULES (Allan!) state that the FEI tests must be ridden in a double bridle and spurs. The rider's ability to use those tools humanely and correctly, and the horse's understanding and confidence within the demands of the test patterns/requirements are also part of the "test". Avoiding learning to ride, and train, with classical tools is just that: avoidance.
There is a reason that disabled riders are allowed to use different tools: their disabilities, like Jackie's, make it necessary at times to modify the requirements so as to make riding, training and competing safe, humane and reasonable for the horses and the riders. For the rest of us, the classical way is the best way, and that includes confronting our own personal demons and learning to ride within the requirements.
I agree with you dbliron on a lot of what you have to say. IF I did not have MS I would probably be facing dressage determined to do it, double bridle, spurs and all!
Working effectively and non-abusively with a double bridle is a high skill, no doubt about that, I know, I've used one off and on through the decades and I never got beyond a most basic level, but my horses usually accepted it with good grace. Just 3 years ago my hands were still good enough that my riding teacher let me introduce one of her horses to the double and I got to ride with it for 3 months. Alas, I can't do it anymore. I see dressage as a way of developing a skilled rider, a rider skilled enough to get very good performances no matter what gear they do or do not use and on whatever type horse.
Barnfrog, I am so glad to read you say that timing is everything. Until I learned this my riding was, at best, mediocre though decent (non-abusive.) Learning the timing is probably the only reason why I can still ride independently instead of being led around.
I realize this example is not nearly the same level as competition, and I do not think dressage competition is easy by any means, but I do think that the possibilities have not been explored by enough people.
If all the dressage hopefuls are operating on a bitted system, and the horses are only trained to that, and the competitions don't recognize any alternative, how do we know of what horses are capable? If there were as many people, spending as much time on a goal of natural dressage, as there are on the current approach, surely there would be more examples of success.
As far as being driven into the bit, it may not be the ideal, but that is exactly what I see on a large number of (obviously tense) dressage horses, either that, or they are contorted to avoid it a much as possible, however valiantly they attempt to perform the exercises asked of them. A very few seem to be accomplishing dressage exercises with happy horses. When I see the horses at the Spanish riding School perform the horse's attitude is very different from most of the competition dressage horses, even though they perform bitted. (after from what I gather is a lot of training with far less constraint). So perhaps the argument is being confused somewhat by a discussion of bit vs. no bit. The problem is something grotesque is being done to too many dressage horses, and the result shows it.
-- Edited by Marlene on Friday 24th of June 2011 12:08:16 PM
It is interesting that peeps now thing that rider w/o a saddle or in a wire (doing things the horse already knows) is a big deal, it is something that all of us used to do as kids. Fun/playing, but not with any particular degree of nuance. But one only has to see the amount of this type of riding in the typical european circus (or the old equitana from throughout the world) to know that we really do know most of the capibilites of the horse. Horsemen all enjoy watching GOOD training, even if out of their field. But good training plays on the nature of the horse to make learning and SCOPE developed.
The number of tense horses today are the result of a couple of things imho: riding without clear theory/methodology, and riders coming to this sport late in life who are mislead into quick fixes and teachers who purport to teach 'on the bit'/quick framing and longitudinal flexion.
Good training IS 'natural' dressage, it plays on the nature's full use of the body and mind. If riders are not taught basic concepts as to how lateral flexibility (ie very basic level that riding a circle allows proper use of the hindlegs which allows for longitudinal flexion over time), or taught HOW TO APPLY EXERCISES THERAPUTICALLY they are merely riding lines by route without TIMING or INTENTION.
The four ecoles (srs/cadre noir/portuguese and spanish schools) ALL ride with the same intentions (collection) and traditionally. They also ALWAYS work on being properly seated. And I agree following the work of peeps like Sjef only produces a grotesque characture of dressage, but now so many peoples eyes are accustomed to this HIGHLY tensioned work as 'good'.
In any case, it is great fun to see the OP play with the horse, ride it out, show a partnership with the horse even though we may disagree with moments, or how this fits into dressage per se. We should always seek the best for the horse, and that has nothing to do with any piece of tack per se, but rather seeking to understand our impact on the horse each day.
That said, what works for a beginner to protect the horse while they learn to ride morphs in standard as they becomes nuanced.THere is not end to that depth. But with all that said, we each must stand for our path and describe our methodology clearly if we want others to follow. For traditionalists the path is clear and defined, and the results meet certain touchstones; we look for a solution in ourselves if the horse resists, it is rarely tack, it is almost always the rider Those that differ in timing or etc must also offer clear descriptions of their alternatives yet few do: SJ should defend his methods and how the results work vis a vie the rules, jump riders their kinds of releases (why automatic release has all but disappears), eventors their new lack of roads and tracks and the effects upon horses falling/dying, PK his use of demi arret to change balance (as both research of the past and how it works...which he does. To ask for those things is never a personal attack, it is merely a request for clarity and informational interaction. Then if riders/observerors want to choose a different way, that is there informed choice. I like informed/educated choices, that is why I am fascinated by someone like Manolo's methods which are very much new information, but anchored in tradition(al balance/purity of gaits) as well.
-- Edited by barnfrog on Saturday 25th of June 2011 05:29:54 PM